We have received a general reply from the PA to Lady Hale, albeit very swiftly.

We give this below together with our reply.

Dear Helen Davies

Thank you for your email of 22 September 2019 regarding the case heard by the Supreme Court Justices earlier this week between 17th and 19th September.

As Lady Hale explained before the hearing started, the Justices had before them two appeals, one from England and Wales and one from Scotland. They both involved the same issue: whether it was lawful for the Prime Minister to advise Her Majesty to authorise the prorogation of Parliament by Order in Council.

Lady Hale continued:

“That this is a serious and difficult question of law is amply demonstrated by the fact that three senior Judges in Scotland have reached a different conclusion from three senior Judges in England and Wales. The Supreme Court exists to decide such difficult questions of law. And we shall do so in accordance with our judicial oaths: to do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of this realm without fear or favour, affection or ill will. It is important to emphasise that we are not concerned with the wider political issues which form the context for this legal issue. As will be apparent when we hear the legal arguments, the determination of this legal issue will not determine when and how the United Kingdom leaves the European Union.”

You will be aware that the hearing has now concluded and you may view the court proceedings via our website (https://www.supremecourt.uk/live/court-01.html).  The Court’s judgment will be published once it is known.

Beyond that we are not able to comment further.

Yours sincerely


Miss Ayo Onatade
PA to the President of the Supreme Court and Lord Kerr
The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom and the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council

Parliament Square, London, SW1P 3BD

and our reply

Dear Miss Onatade,

Thank you very much for your swift reply.

For the sake of the ultimate sovereignty held by the Electorate, and our rights and liberties, all we ask is that the Supreme Court Judges be given the opportunity to read and consider our email letter, for which we were unable to request a formal audience.

We believe that it is vitally important that the Lords and Ladies are aware of the gravitas of the situation.

We would be grateful for confirmation that ‘our voice’ as set out in our email letter has been forwarded to the Judges for their attention.

With thanks


Helen Davies

Second N.B.

Just so you are aware, we have published a copy of our email letter on our web site, in order that the majority of the Electorate may too voice their opinion and support.

We have just done this and to date there are 47 comments which you are welcome to read.




Helen Davies



  1. When the Supreme Court assumes the Right to ignore the wishes of the majority, and acts in a self-serving and entirely self-promoting manner, then they are establishing a Dictatorship.
    When any established Democracy is subsequently discarded, then those who would assume the roll of the Dictator, run the risk of open revolt.

  2. my wife and I support Brexit and feel that the justice system should not have got involved in this political decision against the Democratic majority of the British people.
    R.W. and S.J. Hughes.

  3. I consider that you were not fit to hear this Judgement against the Prime Minister. Four of you were in actual fact friends of the Blairs who helped bring this motion forward and some of these Judges are even REMAINERS themselves. I do not care for your the explanations you gave and what was supposed to be in relation to a DEMOCRATIC VOTE, and Her Majesty had every right to hear from Boris Johnson. This motion was a travesty of our Justice System, to which you did not adhere. All you have done is anger the people more and more, so that it may result in a full scale CIVIL WAR against all that rotten in this country Anyone with an iota of genuine honesty should have told to recluse themselves. You have all done this country a great disservice, with your biased verdict. I am totally disgusted and saddened.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: